Trending Topics

10 active shooter response and training questions every officer should be able to answer

From defining an active shooter to improving police training, these 10 questions prepare law enforcement to respond with confidence and clarity

Atlanta Shooting

While not all active shooters display obvious red flags, many do exhibit concerning behaviors prior to the attack.

AP Photo/Alex Slitz

Active shooter events are unpredictable, fast-moving and, unfortunately, increasingly common. For law enforcement, preparation can mean the difference between chaos and control. Effective active shooter training goes beyond tactical response — it builds the mindset, muscle memory and interagency coordination needed to stop the threat and save lives.

Whether you’re updating departmental policy or leading a roll call training session, these 10 questions can help guide your understanding and preparation. From basic definitions to real-world response tactics, here’s what every officer should know — and be able to answer.

1. What is the definition of an active shooter?

An active shooter is defined by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.” These individuals typically use firearms and do not discriminate in their selection of victims. The intent is mass harm and the attacks are usually spontaneous — with little regard for personal escape or survival.
Unlike other types of violent incidents, active shooter events often unfold rapidly and without warning. The average duration of such incidents is less than 10 minutes, and in many cases, the shooter is already finished by the time law enforcement arrives. This emphasizes the need for proactive training and immediate response protocols.

|Learn more: 5 phases of the active shooter: A tactical reload

2. What are the warning signs of an active shooter?

While not all active shooters display obvious red flags, many do exhibit concerning behaviors prior to the attack. These may include a fascination with weapons or past mass shootings, sudden changes in behavior, isolation, expressions of hopelessness or rage, and direct or veiled threats of violence. Other signs include extensive planning, such as mapping out the target location or rehearsing the attack.

Effective prevention depends on the awareness and vigilance of those around the individual. Agencies should promote a “see something, say something” culture and provide regular training on recognizing pre-incident indicators. Behavioral threat assessment teams, including mental health professionals and officers, can evaluate reports and intervene appropriately.

|Further reading: Behavioral threat assessment and management: Leakage, bystanders and stakeholders


When a young man with harmful intentions is persuaded to seek help, a Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management team’s prompt intervention illustrates their essential function

3. How should law enforcement respond to an active shooter?

The standard response has shifted dramatically since Columbine in 1999. Officers no longer wait for SWAT or backup to arrive before entering a scene. The primary goal is to locate and neutralize the shooter as quickly as possible.

Officers follow the priority of life model: protect innocent civilians first, followed by fellow responders and finally the suspect. Rapid movement, clear communication and coordination are critical. Agencies should train officers in various building layouts, room entry techniques and stress inoculation exercises to increase effectiveness during a crisis.

|Training resource: How to equip and train cops for solo officer active shooter response

4. What are the phases of an active shooter incident?

Active shooter events typically unfold in three key phases:

  • Pre-incident: The shooter may conduct surveillance, plan logistics or exhibit concerning behaviors. This stage presents the greatest opportunity for intervention.
  • Attack phase: The shooter begins the assault, often moving through the target area with speed and intent. The chaos and noise can make it difficult for victims to respond and officers to locate the threat.
  • Post-incident: Law enforcement secures the area, provides aid to victims, processes the crime scene and begins the investigation. The psychological impact on victims and responders also becomes apparent during this stage.

Understanding these phases helps agencies plan response protocols, allocate resources and offer appropriate post-incident support.

|Learn more: Lessons learned from 7 years of active shooter response training

5. How can officers improve their active shooter training?

Active shooter training must go beyond classroom instruction. Officers benefit most from realistic, scenario-based exercises that simulate the stress and unpredictability of a real attack. Force-on-force training using marking cartridges or simunition allows officers to practice decision-making and tactics in high-pressure environments.

Training should also include medical response, communication with other agencies, and navigation of complex environments like schools or commercial buildings. Regular drills that involve fire, EMS and dispatch help ensure everyone is on the same page.

Evaluation and feedback after each drill are key to continuous improvement.

|Related article: Active violence training gaps: Are you covering all critical response areas?


Equip yourself with cutting-edge tactics, psychological insight and decisive strategies to effectively neutralize threats and protect lives during an active shooter response

6. What are the key lessons from past active shooter incidents?

Every major active shooter event reveals gaps in training, communication or equipment.

The 1999 Columbine shooting revealed the dangers of delayed entry. The 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting underscored the challenges of breaching and communication inside complex environments. The 2022 Uvalde tragedy raised serious questions about command and coordination.

Agencies must regularly review after-action reports and use them to shape policy and training. Tactical decisions, radio communication, civilian interactions and post-incident care are all areas for potential improvement. Departments that integrate these lessons are better prepared for future threats.


A fast, coordinated law enforcement response on the Florida State University campus saved lives — here’s what every officer can learn from the incident

7. How can agencies prepare for an active shooter event?

Preparation involves more than officer training. Agencies must engage with schools, houses of worship, government buildings and large employers to develop site-specific response plans. These plans should outline roles, rally points, communication methods and emergency medical procedures.

Conducting regular drills, both tabletop and full-scale, can test and improve these plans. Agencies should also assess their equipment, from door breaching tools to mobile command capabilities. Community outreach programs that educate the public on how to respond (“Run, Hide, Fight”) can also save lives during an incident.


If you are honest enough to admit you do not possess an open mind, then aggressively strive to develop one

8. What role does mental health play in active shooter events?

While most individuals with mental illness are not violent, untreated or undiagnosed mental health issues have played a role in some active shooter cases. The presence of suicidal ideation, delusional thinking or extreme stressors can be contributing factors.

Threat assessment and mental health intervention teams are essential tools for prevention. These interdisciplinary teams can investigate concerning behaviors, assess threat levels, and provide support or referrals. Agencies should also prioritize the mental health of their officers, especially after traumatic incidents, by offering counseling and peer support.


Is there a valid psychosocial explanation for school shootings? This article explores the complex psychological and social factors behind school shootings, challenging simplistic narratives and examining how identity, isolation and cultural influences may contribute to the motivations of school shooters. With insights drawn from criminology and mental health research, it invites law enforcement to consider a deeper understanding of the root causes behind these tragic events.


9. How can officers protect themselves during an active shooter response?

Officers must balance personal safety with rapid threat mitigation. Using cover rather than concealment, maintaining situational awareness and avoiding predictable movement patterns are all critical to survival. Officers should know how to respond alone or as part of a team.

Proper gear can also make a difference. Ballistic vests, trauma kits, rifles and body-worn cameras are standard tools in many departments. Officers should be familiar with how to deploy and maintain their equipment under pressure. Physical fitness and tactical mindset are equally important in high-stakes situations.


While I still feel being a little over-gunned is better, my personal active shooter response “kit” has shrunk dramatically

10. How should law enforcement handle the aftermath of an active shooter incident?

The post-incident phase can last weeks or months and requires a coordinated effort. Victims need medical attention, reunification services and trauma counseling. The crime scene must be secured and processed. Investigators will need to review surveillance footage, interview witnesses and compile reports.

Agencies should provide support for officers involved in the response. Critical incident stress debriefings, access to peer support and regular mental health check-ins are vital to officer well-being. Transparency with the public, media management and internal reviews will also shape the long-term outcome of the incident.

|Resource: Long-term active shooter aftermath: Inside Nashville PD’s ongoing wellness program

NEXT: In this must-watch video, risk management expert Gordon Graham breaks down the critical importance of active threat response training for law enforcement. Learn why preparation, policy, and practice are key to saving lives when seconds count.

Police1 is using generative AI to create some content that is edited and fact-checked by our editors.

Police1 Special Contributors represent a diverse group of law enforcement professionals, trainers, and industry thought leaders who share their expertise on critical issues affecting public safety. These guest authors provide fresh perspectives, actionable advice, and firsthand experiences to inspire and educate officers at every stage of their careers. Learn from the best in the field with insights from Police1 Special Contributors.

(Note: The contents of personal or first person essays reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Police1 or its staff.)

Interested in expert-driven resources delivered for free directly to your inbox? Subscribe for free to any our our Police1 newsletters.